Criminal Law DigestCriminal Law DigestCriminal Law Digest
free online digest

Criminal Law Digest - Indian Penal Code

criminal law digest
 Home >>Law Digest >> Criminal Law Digest >> Indian Penal Code
Add to Favorite
Digest of Supreme Courts and High courts Judgment

 
law digest
Sachin Jana and Anr. v. Sate of West Bengal
Citation : 2008 (2) scale 2

Hon'ble Supreme Court

Held:

"Section 34 has been enacted on principle of joint liability in the doing of a criminal act, the section is only a rule of evidence and does not create a substantive offence. The distinctive feature of the section is the element of participation in action. The liability of one person for an offence committed by another in the course of criminal act perpetrated by several person arises under Section 34 if such criminal act is done in furtherance of a common intention of the person who join in committing the crime. Direct proof of common intension is seldom available and, therefore, such intention can only be inferred from the circumstances appearing from the proved facts of the case and the proved circumstances. In order to bring home the charge of common intention, the prosecution has to establish by evidence, whether direct or circumstantial, that there was plan or meeting of minds of all the accused persons to commit the offence for which they are charged with the aid of Section 34, be its pre-arranged or on the spur of the moment; but it must necessarily be before the commission of the crime. The true concept of the section is that if two or more persons intentionally do an act jointly, the position in law is just the same as if each of them has done it individually by himself.

Para 10

The section does not say “the common intentions of all” nor does it say “an intention common to all”. Under the provisions of Section 34 the essence of the liability is to found in the existence of a common intention animating the accused leading to the doing of a criminal act in furtherance of such intention. As a result of the application of principles enunciated in Section 34, when an accused is convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34, in law it means that the accused is liable for the act which caused death of the deceased in the same manner as if it was done by him alone. The provision is intended to meet a case in which it may be difficult to distinguish between acts of individual members of a party who act in furtherance of the common intention of all or to prove exactly what part was taken by each of them.

Para 11

 

 

 

web hit counter

Legal Encyclopedia | Law Colleges | Online Law Digest | Bare Acts | Terms of Use & Disclaimer
Contact Us | Useful Links | Link to us | Privacy Policy