|
Criminal Procedure Code |
|
|
Bhagirathi Mahapatra v. State of Orissa S. 438- Bail- Anticipatory bail can be granted only by the High Court or a Court of Sessions and the grant is confined only to.. |
|
|
Narayan Singh v. State of M.P Section 438- In the matter of exercising discretion of anticipatory bail under Section 438, Cr. P.C. the persons who fall in the category of |
|
|
Sheik Kashim Bi v. StateThe filing of a charge –sheet by the police and issuing of a warrant by the Magistrate do not put end to the power to grant |
|
Puran Singh v. Ajit SinghThe section makes no distinction whether the arrest is apprehended at the hands of the police or at the instance of the Magistrate |
|
Jodha Ram v. State of RajasthanSection 438-Jurisdiction- The Court within whose jurisdiction a person apprehends his arrest for a non-bailable offence has jurisdiction to grant |
|
Indu Bala v. Delhi AdminstrationSection 438-Counsel for the complainant has no right to be heard the petition for anticipatory bail. He can brief the State Counsel |
|
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of PunjabBail- The Court may, if there are reasons for doing solicit the operation of the order to a short period until after the filing of…… |
|
Avinash Arora and Ors. v. State of U.T. Chandigarh and Anr. Bail-Court committed error in passing the conditional order of depositing Rs. 10 Crore for grant of anticipatory bail…… |
|
State of Punjab Vs. Raninder Singh and Anr. It may be mentioned here that Section 438(2)(i) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is very clear that while granting |
|
Naresh Kumar Yadav Vs. Ravindra Kumar and Ors.The facility which Section 438 of the Code gives is generally referred to as 'anticipatory bail'. This expression which was |
|
Salauddin Abdulsamad Shaikh v. State of MaharashtraAnticipatory bail is granted in anticipation of arrest in non-bailable cases, but that does not mean that the regular court, |
|
Sohan Lal Juneja and Ors. Vs. State of PunjabBecause of non-deposite of amount ordered by High court the interim protection denied |
|
State of U.P v. Amarmani TripathiCancellation of bail- The condition laid down under Section 437 (1) (i) is sine qua non for granting bail even under Section 439 of the Code |
|
Panchanan Mishra v. Digambar MishraThe object underlying the cancellation of bail is to protect the fair trial and secure justice begin done to the society by.. |
|
Som Mittal v. Govt. of KarnatkaS. 482 - In a catena of decisions this Court has deprecated the interference by the high Court in exercise of its inherent |
|
State of Bihar v. J.A.C. SaldanhaSection 482- The high Court in exercise of the extraordinary jurisdiction committed a grave error by making observations on seriously disputed questions of facts |
|
Hazari Lal Gupta v. Rameshwar Pd. Section 482- In exercising jurisdiction under Section 561-A (of old code) of Criminal Procedure Code, the High Court can quash proceedings |
|
Kurukshetra University v. state of Haryana Section 482- it surprises us in the extreme that the High Court thought that in the exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 of the |
|
Sate of Bihar v. Murad Ali Khan The jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code has to be exercised sparingly and with circumspection and has given the |
|
Sate of Haryana & ors v. Bhajan Lal & Ors. The Hon'ble Supreme Court given illustrations where in the inherent power under Section 482 of the Code should be exercised by the High Court |
|
Pritam Singh vs. State of PunjabSection 438- Jurisdiction of the Court - FIR registered at Ludhiana under offences 420, 406 and 411, IPC, -480 books of “Sachi Sakhi’ alleged to have been printed… |
|
Evidence Act |
|
Smt. Shakunala vs. State of Haryana S. 32 -Evidence Act- Though a dying declaration is entitled to great weight, it is worthwhile to note that the accused has no power of cross-examination. Such a power… |
|
Ravi v. State of T.N Section 32 Evidence Act - Dying declaration - If the truthfulness of the dying declaration can not be doubted, the same |
|
Muthu Kutty v. State Section 32- Though a dying declaration is entitled to grate wait, it is worthwhile to note that the accused has no power of cross…. |
|
Indian Penal code |
|
Bishan Singh & Anr V. state Section 308 - Before an accused can be held to be guilty under Section 308 IPC, it was necessary to arrive at a finding that the ingredients |
|
Chinta Phulaa Reddy V. State of A.P Section 34 is applicable even if no injury has been caused by the particular accused himself |
|
Ashok Kumar v. State of Punjab Section 34-The existence of common intention amongst participants in a crime is the essential element for application of this section. |
|
Grija Shankar vs. State of U.P Section 307- To justify a conviction under this section, it is not essential that bodily injury capable of causing death should have been |
|
Sachin Jana and Anr. v. Sate of West Bengal Section 34 has been enacted on principle of joint liability in the doing of a criminal act, the section is only a rule of evidence and does not create a substantive offence. The distinctive… |
|